Data: 9 May 2026

Data Explorer & Export

Browse records interactively or download the full dataset as CSV files. All exports include the latest Round 3 verified data.

Pre-Generated Deliverables

Complete multi-sheet Excel workbook with all entity resolution results, or flat CSV for quick import.

Members Export

Export member profiles with all matched IDs, metrics (H-index, FWCI, citations), topics, and confidence scores.

Publications Export

Export 9,630 publications with DOIs, citations, venues, topics, and rehab-relevance flags.

Funding Export

Export 10,546 funding records with funders, years, and linked researchers.

Clinical Trials Export

Export 130 clinical trials with ACTRN IDs, conditions, status, sponsors, and funding sources.

Interactive Record Browser

Click a tab above to browse records interactively.

Dataset Summary
DatasetRecordsDescriptionKey Fields
Members (research-active)481Members with at least one identified publicationname, profile_id, orcid, h_index, fwci, topics
Members (all)861Complete RMSANZ membership list including those without publicationsname, state, country, confidence, member_status
Publications9,630All identified publications (capped at 200 per member)title, doi, year, venue, cited_by, rehab_relevant
Funding10,546NHMRC, ARC, and other grants linked to memberspublication_title, funder_name, award_id, year, member_name
Data Quality Notes

Entity Resolution: Multi-round verification across academic databases. Includes works-level search to unify fragmented author profiles.

Rehab-Relevance Flag: Keyword-based classification using rehabilitation medicine terminology. This is indicative only and may include false positives/negatives.

H-index & FWCI: Computed from the identified publication set. Members with fragmented profiles may have underestimated metrics if not all works are captured.

Funding Data: Sourced from publicly available NHMRC and ARC databases. May not include all funding sources (e.g., hospital, industry, international).

Limitations: Members who publish under different name variants, or who have very common names, may have incomplete or incorrectly merged profiles. The "REVIEW" confidence tier indicates cases requiring manual verification.